Mechanical properties of vascular grafts play a critical role in medical procedures, serving as substitutes for damaged or diseased blood vessels. Ensuring the right mechanical characteristics is essential for long-term graft functionality and patient safety. This article explores the key mechanical properties required for vascular grafts, the challenges in balancing them, and the latest innovations in materials and manufacturing techniques.

Key Mechanical Properties of Vascular Grafts

Understanding the mechanical properties of vascular grafts is crucial for designing effective implants. The most important properties include:

• Compliance: The ability of a graft to expand and contract with pulsatile blood flow. Mismatched compliance can lead to complications such as intimal hyperplasia.

• Tensile Strength: Measures resistance to longitudinal and circumferential stress, preventing structural failure.

• Burst Pressure: Defines the maximum pressure a graft can endure before rupture, ensuring durability under physiological conditions.

• Suture Retention Strength: Evaluates the graft’s ability to hold sutures without tearing, which is critical during surgical implantation.

• Elastic Recovery: The capacity to return to its original shape after deformation, ensuring consistent performance.

• Stiffness: Resistance to deformation under force, which should ideally align with the mechanical properties of native vessels.

• Wall Thickness: Influences strength, compliance, and the ability to mimic natural vessels.

• Dynamic Compliance: Expansion and contraction under pulsatile flow, crucial for maintaining proper circulation.

• Internal Diameter: Must match the native vessel to prevent flow disturbances and thrombosis.

• Viscoelasticity: A time-dependent response to stress, mimicking natural vessel behavior.

Challenges in Balancing Mechanical Properties

Designing vascular grafts requires careful trade-offs:

• Compliance vs. Strength: High compliance increases flexibility but may reduce tensile strength and burst pressure.

• Wall Thickness vs. Compliance: Thicker walls enhance strength and suture retention but can reduce natural vessel mimicry.

• Stiffness vs. Compliance: While structural integrity is critical, excessive stiffness may lead to graft-vessel mismatch.

• Elastic Recovery vs. Viscoelasticity: Balancing immediate shape recovery with natural time-dependent behavior is challenging.

• Internal Diameter vs. Wall Thickness: Small-diameter grafts make this balance particularly difficult.

• Material Limitations: No single material meets all mechanical requirements, often necessitating composites.

• Long-Term Stability vs. Initial Properties: Maintaining performance over time without degradation is a key concern.

Recent Advancements in Vascular Grafts

Recent developments aim to optimize the mechanical properties of vascular grafts:

Synthetic Materials

• Expanded PTFE (ePTFE): Offers high tensile strength and burst pressure, ideal for large-diameter grafts.

• Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU): Provides flexibility and durability, optimizing tensile strength, compliance, and burst pressure.

• Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Fabric: Balances durability, tensile strength, and compliance.

Composite and Hybrid Materials

• Layered and Hybrid Grafts: Combining synthetic and natural materials improves mechanical performance and biocompatibility.

• Electrospinning: Advanced technique for creating nanofibrous scaffolds with precise mechanical properties. Used with polyurethanes and biodegradable polymers like PCL, it allows customization of graft mechanics.

Conclusion

The mechanical properties of vascular grafts are fundamental to their effectiveness and longevity. Achieving the ideal balance between compliance, tensile strength, and durability remains challenging. Nevertheless, innovations such as composite grafts and electrospinning are driving next-generation solutions.

As technology advances, we move closer to creating vascular grafts that fully replicate native vessel behavior, ultimately improving outcomes in cardiovascular procedures.

Connect With Us

Did this article help you? Share your thoughts in the comments!

For more information or to schedule a meeting:

• Email: am@medibrane.com

• LinkedIn: Medibrane

• Chamfr Store: Explore and purchase our products directly online.

Technological advancements in peripheral vascular stents are revolutionizing the management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD), providing safer, more effective solutions for patients. Among the primary options are bare metal stents (BMS) and covered stents, each offering distinct benefits and limitations. This article offers a detailed comparison of these devices, covering design, clinical applications, advantages, limitations, and evidence-based outcomes, while exploring the future of stent technologies in vascular treatment.

What Are Peripheral Vascular Stents? Types & Applications

Peripheral vascular stents are self-expanding devices designed to keep blood vessels open and prevent restenosis.
They are commonly used in:

• Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD): Treating atherosclerotic blockages in iliac, femoral, or popliteal arteries.

• Aneurysms: Providing structural support to weakened vessel walls.

• Vessel Occlusions: Managing blockages in smaller peripheral arteries.

Types of Peripheral Vascular Stents

1. Bare Metal Stents (BMS): Made from nitinol or stainless steel, relying on natural endothelialization for vessel healing.

2. Covered Stents: Combine a metallic framework with a polymeric or fabric coating (e.g., ePTFE, Dacron) to improve sealing and reduce complications.

3. Hybrid Stents: Merge the features of BMS and covered stents, offering specialized solutions for complex lesions.

For more detailed information, check our guide on ePTFE-coated stents.

Covered vs. Bare Metal Stents: A Comparative Review

Bare Metal Stents (BMS)

BMS are commonly used for short lesions in large arteries, valued for their simplicity and flexibility.

Advantages:

• Superior trackability in tortuous anatomy

• Cost-effective compared to covered stents

• Smaller delivery systems for challenging anatomies

Limitations:

• Higher restenosis rates (20–40%) due to intimal hyperplasia

• Lack of sealing properties, unsuitable for aneurysms or vessel perforations

Covered Stents

Covered stents combine a metallic scaffold with a coating for enhanced sealing and protective functions.

Advantages:

• Improved occlusion rates for complex lesions

• Sealing capacity for aneurysms and perforations

• Lower risk of thrombosis compared to BMS

Limitations:

• Reduced flexibility, challenging deployment in tortuous vessels

• Higher cost

• Requires larger sheath sizes

Key Benefits with Advanced Coatings:

• Faster endothelialization and healing

• Improved biocompatibility, reducing inflammation

• Increased complete occlusion rates in long lesions and aneurysms

• Lower perioperative risks, such as thrombosis and infection

Challenges and Considerations

Despite their advantages, covered stents face some challenges:

• Material biocompatibility concerns may lead to inflammation or tissue growth

• Reduced flexibility may limit use in tortuous or calcified vessels

• Long-term durability and material degradation

• Regulatory approval requires extensive clinical testing

The Future of Peripheral Vascular Stents

Covered and hybrid stents are shaping the future of PAD treatment. With advances in material science, drug-eluting coatings, and bioactive surfaces, these stents are expected to overcome current limitations and enhance patient outcomes. They will likely become central to the management of complex vascular conditions.

Explore our peripheral vascular stent portfolio to learn more about our products and innovative coatings.

Selecting the right material for Dacron vs ePTFE vascular covers is essential for clinical success. Both materials offer unique properties for stents, grafts, and structural heart devices. This article highlights their advantages, disadvantages, and ideal applications to help guide material selection.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Dacron Vascular Covers

Advantages:

• Strong Mechanical Properties: Provides reliable structural support.

• Porous Structure: Facilitates tissue ingrowth and reduces device migration.

• Suitable for Larger Vessels: Ideal for vessels >10mm and structural heart devices.

• Ease of Suturing: Simplifies surgical procedures.

Disadvantages:

• Initial Inflammation: The woven structure can trigger early inflammatory response.

• Potential Complications: May cause thrombosis, intimal hyperplasia, calcification, and chronic inflammation.

• Suturing Requirements: Time-consuming and may increase cover thickness.

Advantages and Disadvantages of ePTFE Vascular Covers

Advantages:

• Excellent Biocompatibility: Highly compatible with body tissues.

• Lower Thrombogenicity: Reduced risk of thrombosis compared to Dacron.

• Porous Structure & Controlled Porosity: Promotes tissue integration.

• Suitable for Smaller Vessels: Performs well in vessels <6mm.

Disadvantages:

• Difficulty Suturing: More challenging to stitch than Dacron.

• Potential Complications: Can still lead to intimal hyperplasia and calcification.

• Higher Cost: Generally more expensive than Dacron.

Applications of Dacron

• Large-Diameter Vascular Grafts (>10mm): High patency rates (>85% at 5 years) and structural support.

• Structural Heart Devices: Heart valve sewing rings, annuloplasty rings.

• Hernia Repair Meshes: Durable support for abdominal wall defects.

• Ligament and Tendon Reconstruction: Used as artificial ligaments or reinforcement.

• Sutures: Non-absorbable sutures for long-term wound closure.

• Fabric-Covered Stents: Provides durable coverage promoting tissue integration.

Applications of ePTFE

• Small-Diameter Vascular Grafts (<6mm): Reduced thrombogenicity and optimized tissue integration.

• Hemodialysis Access Grafts: Lower infection rates and easy needle puncture.

• Aortic Replacement: Withstands high pressure and flow, customizable for flexibility.

• Cardiovascular Patches: Used in congenital heart defect repairs and vessel reconstructions.

• Endovascular Stent Grafts: Low profile, conforms to vessel walls, reduces endoleaks.

• Soft Tissue Augmentation: Plastic surgery for facial reconstruction and body contouring.

• Patches for Vessel Repair: Smaller vessels benefit from lower thrombogenicity and better handling.

Combined Applications

• Hybrid Vascular Grafts: Combines Dacron and ePTFE for complex reconstructions.

• Composite Hernia Meshes: Leverages both materials for strength and tissue integration.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Material

The choice between Dacron and ePTFE depends on clinical requirements:

• Dacron: Best for larger vessels and high-stress areas due to strength and ease of suturing.

• ePTFE: Ideal for smaller vessels where biocompatibility and reduced thrombogenicity are essential.

Ongoing research continues to refine both materials, enhancing their performance and expanding their medical applications.

Precision in Modern Medical Devices

In today’s world of advanced medical technologies, precision is crucial, especially in developing minimally invasive devices. The growing demand for microlayer tubes made from low durometer materials is driving significant advancements in the field. While extruded tubes have traditionally been used for applications requiring stiffness and thick walls, they face challenges when applied to miniature devices with ultra-thin walls—such as those measuring 0.001″. This is where microlayer tubes make a difference.

The Advantages of Medibrane’s Microlayer Technology

At Medibrane, we offer a diverse selection of microlayer tubes designed to meet the most stringent requirements. These tubes feature a minimum wall thickness of just 0.00059″ and diameters ranging from 0.00394″ to 0.984″. Moreover, our proprietary polymer deposition methods enable us to create layers as thin as 0.0001″, achieving tolerances as precise as +/- 0.0002″.

Unparalleled Control and Flexibility

One of the standout benefits of microlayer tubes is their ability to provide superior control over wall thickness. As a result, inner lumen space is maximized, while the overall device profile remains minimal. Additionally, these tubes feature variable durometers along their length, enhancing flexibility and adaptability for diverse applications.

Meeting Manufacturing Challenges

Historically, producing large bore polymer tubing with ultra-thin walls posed significant challenges. However, Medibrane’s microlayer technology overcomes these obstacles. By leveraging innovative techniques, we can manufacture tubing that meets the needs of even the most demanding applications.

Material Adaptability for Custom Solutions

Our microlayer technology supports various durometer polyurethane resins, ranging from 55 shore D to 40 shore A. This flexibility allows us to cater to specific project requirements, ensuring optimal performance every time.

Practical Benefits for Medical Applications

In addition to their precision, microlayer tubes offer other key advantages. For instance, they significantly reduce the tackiness of soft materials. This characteristic is critical in applications requiring smooth and non-sticky surfaces, such as neurovascular microcatheters and large-diameter delivery systems for structural heart devices.

Transforming the Medical Industry

As the demand for precision in minimally invasive devices continues to grow, microlayer tubes are poised to revolutionize the industry. Their exceptional control over wall thickness and ability to adapt to various durometers make them invaluable for developing advanced medical technologies.

Learn more about our advanced polymer solutions, or explore our custom coating processes that complement microlayer tubing.
For a quick purchase of our microlayer tubes, visit us on Chamfr.